This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Running Back Bo Jackson is taken down by a trio of Oregon Ducks during the Buckeyes 41-28 Loss at the hands of the Ducks. (OREGON FOOTBALL)

For 15 minutes, Ohio State looked like a team ready to make a statement. For the next 45, it looked like a program that had completely forgotten how to play football.

The Buckeyes came out firing against Oregon, building a 14-0 lead after the opening quarter and appearing to have the Ducks on their heels. But whatever momentum Ohio State carried into the second quarter quickly evaporated. What followed was one of the most embarrassing stretches of football in recent program history, as Oregon rattled off 38 unanswered points and turned a promising start into a complete dismantling of the Buckeyes.

The final score read 41-28 in favor of Oregon, but the scoreboard hardly tells the story. This was not simply a matter of Ohio State losing a competitive football game. It was a comprehensive failure of preparation, in-game adjustments, quarterback play and coaching that left more questions than answers about the direction of this program.

And perhaps most concerning, many of the same problems that have plagued Ohio State throughout the season showed up again when the stakes were highest.

Oregon made the adjustments. Ohio State watched.

Credit where it is due: Oregon head coach Dan Lanning and his offensive staff deserve plenty of recognition for how they responded to Ohio State's opening-quarter success.

Dylan Raiola and the Ducks settled into the game, found weaknesses in the Buckeyes' defensive approach and began exploiting them with remarkable consistency. Oregon appeared to have an answer for nearly everything Ohio State threw at it after the opening quarter.

The more troubling part of the story was on the opposite sideline.

While Lanning adjusted his game plan and found ways to attack Ohio State, Ryan Day and his coaching staff appeared content to let the game unravel. There was no meaningful response, no visible change in approach and certainly no indication that the Buckeyes had a counterpunch ready.

A 14-point lead disappeared. Then another score followed. Then another.

By the time Ohio State finally found its footing again, Oregon had taken complete control of the game.

Good teams make adjustments. Championship-caliber teams anticipate them. On Saturday, Ohio State did neither.

Luke Fahey and an offense without answers

If there was one position group that desperately needed to deliver a response, it was the offense. Instead, the Buckeyes received a quarterback performance that left plenty to be desired.

Freshman quarterback Luke Fahey looked overwhelmed for much of the afternoon. His pocket presence deteriorated, his decision-making became increasingly questionable and his inability to consistently find open receivers prevented Ohio State from generating any meaningful offensive rhythm.

Fahey repeatedly abandoned clean pockets, took unnecessary sacks and missed opportunities downfield. There were also several questionable decisions, including throws into heavily covered areas and an alarming tendency to overlook Jeremiah Smith for extended stretches of the second and third quarters.

Smith is not simply another receiver in the Ohio State offense. He is one of the most talented playmakers on the roster, and getting him involved should be a priority regardless of the circumstances. Yet, for much of the afternoon, the Buckeyes seemed perfectly comfortable allowing their most dangerous offensive weapon to become an afterthought.

Eventually, the frustration reached the point where fans were openly calling for backup quarterback Tavien St. Clair to get an opportunity.

That is not where Ohio State wants to be with its quarterback situation.

Fahey deserves some grace as a freshman facing a talented opponent, but youth cannot excuse every mistake. The coaching staff also has a responsibility to put him in positions to succeed. On Saturday, neither the quarterback nor the people responsible for developing the game plan did enough.

Arthur Smith's offense was predictable, ineffective and painfully stagnant.

The quarterback struggles were only part of the problem. Offensive coordinator Arthur Smith deserves his share of the criticism for what was arguably an even more concerning lack of creativity and adjustment.

For much of the middle portion of the game, Ohio State's offense looked completely out of ideas. The Buckeyes continued to lean on short routes, predictable two-yard outs and perimeter screens that Oregon had already demonstrated an ability to defend.

There was little creativity, limited downfield aggression and almost no indication that Smith was attempting to exploit the defensive adjustments Oregon had made.

At some point, an offensive coordinator has to recognize when something is not working.

If Oregon is sitting on the short passing game, push the ball downfield. If the defense is bringing pressure, create opportunities for quick throws that actually move the chains. If the quarterback is struggling to find his rhythm, manufacture touches for the playmakers who can take pressure off him.

Instead, Ohio State continued running variations of the same unsuccessful plays and expected a different result.

Jeremiah Smith was underutilized. The passing game lacked an identity. The offense struggled to establish any consistent rhythm.

And perhaps the most frustrating part was that the Buckeyes appeared to have the personnel to do considerably more.

Devin McCuin was one of the few bright spots, finishing with 84 receiving yards while serving as a frequent target for Fahey's checkdowns. It was arguably his strongest showing in a Buckeye uniform, but even his production came largely as a result of Ohio State struggling to get the ball downfield.

Bo Jackson also saw plenty of involvement, recording seven receptions. However, those opportunities produced just 42 yards, highlighting the lack of explosiveness in an offense that desperately needed someone to make a play.

Ohio State does not lack talent. It lacks a consistent plan to get that talent into positions where it can make a difference.

The defense was no better.

While the offense deserves plenty of scrutiny, the defense should not escape this conversation.

The Buckeyes surrendered 38 consecutive points after their opening-quarter lead, and there were very few moments during that stretch that suggested the defense could slow Oregon down.

Ohio State struggled to generate consistent pressure on Raiola, continuing a troubling trend that has followed the defensive front throughout the season. When the quarterback has time to operate, even talented defensive secondaries can find themselves in difficult situations.

The Buckeyes also failed to capitalize on opportunities to create turnovers, dropping interceptions that could have potentially changed the momentum of the game.

Coverage breakdowns, missed opportunities and players consistently finding themselves out of position made for an ugly afternoon on the defensive side of the football.

A defense with Ohio State's recruiting talent and expectations cannot repeatedly allow opposing quarterbacks to operate comfortably while surrendering extended scoring drives.

The pass rush has to improve. The tackling has to improve. The communication and execution have to improve.

At this point in the season, these are no longer isolated mistakes. They are recurring problems.

How much longer can Ryan Day afford performances like this?

Perhaps the biggest question coming out of Saturday's loss has nothing to do with Fahey, Smith or the defensive front.

It starts at the top.

Ryan Day now finds himself facing a level of scrutiny that is difficult to ignore. Ohio State has suffered back-to-back losses for the first time in years, and the manner in which this one unfolded makes it particularly difficult to defend the coaching staff.

Day is paid to prepare this team, manage the game and make the necessary adjustments when things are not going according to plan. On Saturday, Ohio State appeared to be lacking in all three departments.

A 14-0 lead should provide a team with an opportunity to dictate the pace of a football game. Instead, the Buckeyes allowed Oregon to completely flip the script, and the coaching staff never appeared capable of stopping the bleeding.

The questions surrounding Day are becoming increasingly difficult to avoid. Is he still the right person to lead Ohio State? Has the program reached a point where another coaching change should be considered? And how much of the responsibility should fall on the coordinators who have repeatedly failed to get consistent performances from a roster loaded with talent?

Arthur Smith and Matt Patricia should be facing just as many questions about their respective units. Smith's offensive approach was uninspiring, while Patricia's defense struggled to generate pressure, create turnovers and contain Oregon's offense.

If Ohio State is serious about competing for national championships, it cannot continue accepting performances like this from its coaching staff.

There is a difference between losing to a talented opponent and getting thoroughly outcoached. Saturday looked a lot more like the latter.

The bigger picture

Nobody expected Ohio State to go undefeated every season. Losses happen, talented opponents make plays, and even championship-caliber teams have difficult afternoons.

But this was about more than a loss.

The Buckeyes had an opportunity to respond after a disappointing game against USC, establish some momentum and remind the country why Ohio State is considered one of the premier programs in college football.

Instead, they produced 15 minutes of quality football followed by an extended collapse that exposed nearly every weakness this team has carried throughout the season.

The offensive identity remains questionable. The quarterback position is unsettled. The defensive pass rush continues to disappoint, and the coaching staff has yet to demonstrate the consistency in adjustments that should be expected at a program of this caliber.

Ohio State cannot recruit at an elite level, boast one of the most talented rosters in the country and continue producing performances that look this unprepared.

The Buckeyes do not need another reminder of how talented they are. They need answers from the people responsible for putting that talent to work.

Because Saturday was not just a bad loss. It was a warning sign.

And if Ryan Day, Arthur Smith and Matt Patricia cannot find a way to correct the problems that have followed this team throughout the season, the conversation in Columbus may soon shift from how Ohio State gets back to competing for championships to who will be responsible for getting it there.

Keep Reading